Search all ´óÏóÊÓƵsites
Menu
National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to healthcare
´óÏóÊÓƵ
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Program
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report Data Tools
- Network of Patient Safety Databases
- ´óÏóÊÓƵQuality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- Surveys on Patient Safety Culture
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Search Data Sources Available From AHRQ
SHARE:
Search All Research Studies
´óÏóÊÓƵResearch Studies Date
´óÏóÊÓƵResearch Studies
Sign up:
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by ´óÏóÊÓƵor authored by ´óÏóÊÓƵresearchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedVickers BP, Shi J, Lu B
Comparative study of ED mortality risk of US trauma patients treated at level I and level II vs nontrauma centers.
The researchers used National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) data to explore the hypothesis that severely injured trauma victims properly triaged to a level I or level II trauma center have significantly lower odds of death than those undertriaged to a non-trauma center. They found that trauma patients with Injury Severity Score of greater than 25 received most benefit from proper triage. Efforts to reduce undertriage should focus on this population.
AHRQ-funded; HS022277.
Citation: Vickers BP, Shi J, Lu B .
Comparative study of ED mortality risk of US trauma patients treated at level I and level II vs nontrauma centers.
Am J Emerg Med 2015 Sep;33(9):1158-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.05.010..
Keywords: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Emergency Department, Trauma, Comparative Effectiveness, Mortality
Patel MB, Humble SS, Cullinane DC
Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient: a systematic review and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.
The authors’ aims were to perform a systematic review and to develop evidence-based recommendations that might be used to direct decision making in the removal of a cervical collar from adult obtunded blunt trauma patients. In conclusion, they conditionally recommended cervical collar removal after a negative high-quality C-spine CT scan result alone.
AHRQ-funded; HS017952.
Citation: Patel MB, Humble SS, Cullinane DC .
Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient: a systematic review and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015 Feb;78(2):430-41. doi: 10.1097/ta.0000000000000503..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Trauma, Shared Decision Making
