National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to healthcare
大象视频
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS庐) Program
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report Data Tools
- Network of Patient Safety Databases
- 大象视频Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- Surveys on Patient Safety Culture
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Search Data Sources Available From AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
大象视频Research Studies Date
大象视频Research Studies
Sign up:
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by 大象视频or authored by 大象视频researchers.
Results
1 to 1 of 1 Research Studies DisplayedAlmario CV, Chey WD, Iriana S
Computer versus physician identification of gastrointestinal alarm features.
This study's objective was to compare the number of alarms documented by physicians during usual care vs. that collected by a computer algorithm called Automated Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Symptoms (AEGIS). AEGIS identified more patients with positive alarm features compared to physicians and also documented more positive alarms. Moreover, clinicians documented only 30% of the positive alarms self-reported by patients through AEGIS.
AHRQ-funded; HS000046.
Citation: Almario CV, Chey WD, Iriana S .
Computer versus physician identification of gastrointestinal alarm features.
Int J Med Inform 2015 Dec;84(12):1111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.07.006.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Digestive Disease and Health, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Patient Safety
